Sisqu files suit over thong!!!

Ok so Sisqu really is not suing anyone, at least that I know of. Sisqu is known for the "thong song" a hit song several years ago, but there may be a resurgence of this song. Why? Well that is because Macrida Patterson is suing Victoria's Secret over "faulty underwear". What!! You read correctly. Check the link below: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032619/#25258620

First of all I have to say how silly this really is. Apparently Ms. Patterson was wearing a "decorative thong". I'm not exactly sure there is a thing called "decorative thong", but if there is, it has to be of sexual nature. Is she a prostitute?

The thong apparently was faulty. I can think of several ways that underwear can be faulty. Not wiping your ass incorrectly leaves shit stains. That is faulty. Holes in your underwear are also faulty. However, wearing your underwear as you gain weight is your fault. According to Ms. Patterson a "metal" part of her underwear flew and scratched her eye. Why. I go with the too fat scenario. Why did you need metal in your underwear again?

According to her attorney the underwear was faulty in its design and manufacture. Is that really possible?

Too Much info? Probably. However, in an unmatched journalistic moment, Meredith Viera asked those tough questions. You know those questions Tim Russert was known to ask.

"How many times did you wear this underwear"? "Did you launder your underwear"?
Ms. Patterson's answer; “No Meredith, I wore it like maybe once, like, no, maybe twice". She further states that she has "a lot of underwear from Victoria’s Secret so I didn't have to wear it a lot".

One week supply? Two week supply? We need to know.

In this hard-hitting case and through Meredith Viera's top notch journalistic skills we also learned that Victoria's Secret actually asked for the "defective underwear" so that they could analyze it. EEEEEWWWWWW gross. The young pup lawyer denied because he wanted to keep the evidence. Why? Don't you know that your chance of getting a Victoria's Secret model has just rapidly deteriorated?

In one of the greatest lines I have ever hear the young pup lawyer responds to Viera's "How much money do you want"? By stating "This case is definitely about protecting the consumer from ah you know being exposed to and being harmed from these potential products"
That is definitely code for "the closest I will ever be to seeing a naked women has to be locating all women who have purchased this product in hopes that one of them will try it on in front of me!!!"

In closing the young pup attorney slips up by stating "we want to make sure that Vict... ah Macrida Patterson (Ms. Patterson shoots a dirty look) is fully redressed for her grievous injury".
In all honesty this is the dumbest lawsuit since the McDonald's "I can't believe coffee hot suit"